Skip to content

How John Lennon Avoided Being A Musical Hypocrite

  • by

John Lennon wrestled with the idea of hypocrisy throughout his life. As both an artist and a public figure, he strived to distance himself from it, yet his actions and words often drew scrutiny. Even his tragic death was tied to this theme, as his killer, Mark David Chapman, claimed Lennon embodied the “phonies” from Catcher in the Rye.

For a time, Lennon found an escape from this shadow. During his solo career, he managed to shed some of the expectations and compromises that came with being a Beatle. This freedom allowed him to express himself more authentically, free from the constraints of group dynamics or commercial obligations.

Staying true to his beliefs came at a cost. Radio stations banned some of his music, and his candor often sparked controversy. Yet, Lennon embraced the backlash, choosing honesty over appeasement and leaving behind a legacy that felt raw and unapologetic.

John Lennon handwritten lyrics for The Beatles’ song ‘A Day In The Life’ sold at auction for $1.2 million, 2010. pic.twitter.com/F9zcc6zQsh

— Classic Rock In Pics (@crockpics) October 23, 2024

John Lennon’s Bold Move Beyond the Beatles

The Beatles were known for balancing creativity with mainstream appeal. Even their most experimental tracks had a pop sensibility that kept them on the airwaves. But John Lennon wasn’t one to stick to formulas. After the Beatles disbanded, he wasted no time breaking away from societal expectations.

Lennon’s solo career showcased his unfiltered voice, and “Working Class Hero” is a prime example. Released in 1970 on his debut solo album, the song featured the F-bomb not once, but twice. This was a daring choice, especially in an era when radio censorship was far stricter than it is today.

In a 1971 Rolling Stone interview, Lennon defended his decision to include the expletives. To him, leaving them out would have been worse artistically. It was a statement of authenticity, reflecting his commitment to honest and unpolished expression.

Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr and the families of John Lennon and George Harrison – have granted full life story and music rights for Sam Mendes’ ambitious four-part ‘BEATLES’ biopic.

Set to be interconnected stories, from each band member’s point of view, leading up to their 1970… pic.twitter.com/AjLi1VCKn8

— Film Updates (@FilmUpdates) June 10, 2024

Lennon’s Take on Authenticity

“For me, [f***] fit,” Lennon once said, reflecting on his bold lyric choices in “Working Class Hero.” He admitted he hadn’t even realized the word appeared twice in the song until someone pointed it out. To Lennon, censoring himself would have been the true hypocrisy, betraying his own way of speaking and thinking.

The stakes were high for Lennon’s first solo album after the Beatles. Fans and critics alike wondered if he could stand on his own musically and creatively. Many in his position might have played it safe, leaning on past successes or avoiding controversy altogether.

Instead, Lennon did the opposite. He used his music to challenge norms and express unfiltered honesty. By doing so, he made it clear that his artistry wasn’t tied to the Beatles’ fame—it was a force all its own.

John Lennon wearing five sunglasses, 1970’s. pic.twitter.com/IP5WoCW4wn

— Classic Rock In Pics (@crockpics) June 13, 2022

The Meaning Behind “Working Class Hero”

Lennon held “Working Class Hero” in high regard, calling its concept “revolutionary.” He saw it as a reflection of his own life—a working-class kid pushed toward becoming part of the middle-class system. To Lennon, the song wasn’t just personal; it was a warning to others about the societal machinery that shapes lives.

However, he believed the song’s true tone was often misunderstood. “It was supposed to be sardonic,” Lennon explained, emphasizing that it wasn’t about promoting socialism or offering life advice. The lyrics were more of a dry commentary on the journey to success and its hollow rewards.

Lennon’s message wasn’t prescriptive. He wasn’t telling people what to do or what to avoid. Instead, he laid out a reality: climbing the ladder might lead to dissatisfaction, much like his own experience. The choice, he implied, was ultimately up to the individual.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *